In the case of the MastrII,its the 100% duty heatsink and the extra 
shielding and control offered by the repeater package that makes all the 
difference in the world.
I have a MastrII UHF porta-peater which really works well in the mobile 
chassis.73,Lee


Robin Midgett wrote:
> I've been following this thread with interest, and have a couple of 
> points which (of course) lead to more questions.
> The MASTRII RF strips are the same in the repeater chassis and the 
> mobile rigs, band for band from low band to UHF. Flexibility and 
> convenience options (and continuous duty PA issues) aside, why is a 
> MII repeater station better used as a repeater than a MII mobile rig?
> I don't know if a Micor mobile and Micor repeater use the same RF 
> strips or not..do they? If so, then the same question applies, with 
> the same qualifiers. Same answer?
> Granted, a reliable repeater is not made from a pair of "whatever you 
> can scrounge" mobile rigs with a controller in the middle. (Maxar 
> comes to mind as something in that category). Also in that line up 
> are amateur radios with 20% duty cycle, or practically anything that 
> says Alinco on it.
> Where reliability concerns are fewer and convenience issues are 
> greater, then latitude is greater and mobile radios with a controller 
> in the middle (port-a-peaters) become attractive.
> Thoughts?
>
>
> At 11:55 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
>   
>> TGundo 2003 wrote:
>>     
>>> Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't an R-100 basically two mobiles in
>>> a box with a power supply?
>>>       
>> Not really. While it shares a lot with the Maxtrac, it is a unique, from
>> the ground up repeater. It definitely has a lot less in common with a
>> Maxtrac then a Flexar repeater has in common with a regular Flexar.
>> --
>> Jim Barbour
>> WD8CHL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>   




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to