Bob -
Thanks for straightening me out. I'll apply to the coordination
council for that pair.
Paul
On May 11, 2006, at 11:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 5/10/2006 23:15, you wrote:
>
>
>> Bob -
>
>
>> I was just looking at the 144.930/147.585 pair used for itinerant
>> repeaters elsewhere. In New York, UNYREPCO coordination policy calls
>> for 15-mile spacing with the "adjacent" 147.015/147.615 pair used by
>> N2IED in Corning.
>>
>> Paul W2ARK
>
> 147.585 isn't adjacent to 147.615, so no geographic spacing should be
> required.
>
> FWIW, in our bandplan 147.585 is the input.
>
> Bob NO6B
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
