There's a discussion of flipping over the Micor receiver AFC diodes
on the web page at
<http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/micoruhfmobile.html>.

Mike

At 07:00 AM 11/29/06, you wrote:
>
>    Wouldn't hurt ... but if you want the AFC to work properly, you will need
>   to change the direction of the discriminator diodes.
>
>    Neil -
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 7:31 am
>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: spur from UHF MASTR II mobile - link radio
>
> > Should the same high-side injection be requested when ordering 440-
> > 450 MHz crystals for a MICOR channel element? So far, everything
> > has tuned up very well just having ICM make new crystals according
> > to the standard MICOR receiver formula, and I always send in the
> > channel elements to be completely temperature compensated, etc.
> > while I'm at it. But I've wondered if future orders should also
> > request that they be ordered with high-side injection?
> >
> > LJ
> >
> >
> > ----Original Message-----
> > >From: k6jsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Nov 27, 2006 9:00 PM
> > >To: [email protected]
> > >Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: spur from UHF MASTR II mobile -
> > link radio
> > >
> > >--- In [email protected], "Don Kupferschmidt"
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Nate,
> > >>
> > >> I'm wondering if you can point me to a link that would further
> > >explain lo /
> > >> hi injection.  Hate to admit, but I'm not all that familiar
> > about
> > >the
> > >> subject, especially in repeater operation.
> > >>
> > >> TIA,
> > >>
> > >> Don, KD9PT
> > >>
> > >>
> > > (Snip)
> > >
> > >Hi Don,
> > >
> > >The normal MASTR II receiver uses a low-side Local Oscillator
> > >injection for their mixer.  The IF is 11.2 MHz, so you deduct
> > 11.2
> > >MHz from the operating frequency.  The normal operating frequency
> > >for the 88 series MASTR II radios is 450 to 470, so the LO (Local
> > >Oscillator) is engineered to run between 438.8 and 458.8 MHz (450 ?
> > >11.2 = 438.8; and 470 ?11.2 = 458.8).
> > >
> > >When we in the amateur radio service order a low-side injection
> > >crystal, we are essentially asking the LO to operate between
> > 428.8
> > >and 438.8 MHz, worst case being 10 MHz below the engineered
> > >operating frequency range (440 ?11.2 = 428.8, and 450 ?11.2 =
> > >438.8)  This is stretching the original design of the local
> > >oscillator 10 MHz beyond the design parameters.
> > >
> > >If we order high-side injection crystals, we add 11.2 MHz to our
> > >operating frequency, rather than subtract it.  So the LO will
> > runs
> > >between 451.2 and 461.2 MHz (440 + 11.2 = 451.2, and 450 +11.2 =
> > >462.2).
> > >
> > >If you are operating in an area of the country where you run low-
> > in,
> > >high-out split repeaters, your receivers will operate between 440
> > >and 445 MHz, and the highest possible LO frequency will be 456.2
> > MHz
> > >(445 + 11.2 = 456.2), or right in the sweet spot for the LO range
> > >(438.8 and 458.8).
> > >
> > >If you are operating in an area of the country where you run high-
> > >in, low-out split repeaters, and your receiver will operate
> > between
> > >445 and 450 MHz, and the highest possible LO frequency will be
> > 450 +
> > >11.2 = 462.2, or only 3.4 MHz higher than the designed frequency
> > of
> > >the LO.
> > >
> > >The cross-over frequency seems to be 448.300 MHz, which is 1.7
> > MHz
> > >higher at a high-side injection than designed, and a low-side
> > >injection is 1.7 MHz lower than designed Local Oscillator.
> > >
> > >So, maybe a good rule of thumb would be to order high-side
> > injection
> > >on operating frequencies below 448.300, and low-side injection on
> > >receive frequencies above 448.300.  That way, the worst case
> > >scenario is your being either 1.7 MHz higher or lower than the
> > >original engineered design on the local oscillator.
> > >
> > >You can do the same math for high-band radios.  Same IF.
> > >
> > >Hope that helps.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Reply via email to