If this is really the case, I am interested in this information also.

 

 

 

 

james//

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Manning
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 12:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB-224

 

Skipp025

    If you have sufficient time I would appreciate a scan of the DB-224
antennas.  Of particular interest is the 220Mhz version as it seems you
could take a discard 150 version and modify it to use on 220.  Thanks de Tom
Manning, AF4UG [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> net

----- Original Message ----- 

From: skipp025 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  

To: Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:[email protected]>
yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 10:45 AM

Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB-224

 

I've got to lay off that darn "Single Malt"... You are right! But 
I did make the drawings for the 224 and it would not be a big deal 
to rescan them if I had a senior moment and thought I did the scans 
with the rest of the db antennas. Or it could just be missing from 
the web page group and in my files collection at work. 

All those wanting the db-224 scans please send me an email direct 
and I'll get them out to you Tuesday or Wednesday. If I hit the 
California Lotto.. might be delayed as I have a one in 53-million 
chance of being that special person. That is... if I buy a ticket... 

skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 

> "Paul Holm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skipp,
> 
> I don't see the dB-224 referenced on your page. Am I just missing it?
> 
> 73 Paul
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "skipp025" 
> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 7:42 PM
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB-224
> 
> 
> www.radiowrench.com/sonic
> s.
> 
> "rosewater42103" <fred_flowers@> wrote:
> >
> > i need to sort out some junk. Does anyone have the element &
phasing 
> > harness dimensions for the different band splits of the dB-224. I 
> > found the 138-150 split on repeater-builder. However I didn't
find the 
> > others.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Fred N4GER
>

 

Reply via email to