At 1/14/2007 17:01, you wrote: >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Jan 14 >11:33 -0600]: > > > I also have a 220 Isopole but no data sheet. Never needed it, > > though. AFAIK the upper decoupling cone mounts at the top of the mast > near > > the feedpoint, & the 2nd cone mounts at the bottom of the 1st. Then > again, > > maybe I'm wrong & that's why that antenna never worked worth a darn. > >As I recall (been a long time) the upper cone had to be mounted below >the feedpoint a distance about equivalent to the length of the stinger. >The second cone did indeed mount below the first.
Yes, I see that from the prior posting of the instructions. I guess that's why it didn't work well for me. I thought it was supposed to be a dipole equivalent so figured the 1st cone goes right at the feedpoint. Now I'd like to know the theory behind the correct cone placement. Bob NO6B
