At 1/27/2007 18:37, you wrote:

>>the circuit I've been using is at
>><http://www.tasma.org/micorsq.png>http://www.tasma.org/micorsq.png.
>>
>
>I see some potentially major problems with the TASMA circuit, as it is not 
>a replica of the OEM Motorola circuitry; like the one I provided.

That circuit is essentially a copy of a circuit designed by Bill Wood W6FXJ 
(ex-WB6FXJ) of the Goldstone ARC/JPLARC in 1979.  Bill also included some 
active pre-filtering which I later determined had no effect.  As far as the 
other differences go, I've never analyzed them in detail but knowing Bill, 
he wouldn't make a change without a good reason.  I suppose I should send 
him a query sometime & find out just what his reasoning was for the changes.

I never thought pin 10 was ever intended to drive a squelch gate.  The one 
thing I like most about the Micor squelch is how fast the decay time is for 
strong signals: at around a millisecond or two, it's even faster than the 
Mastr II fast squelch.  If it's done right (not just the circuit itself but 
the audio gating as well - no "pops") & the user doesn't have a "dirty" 
unkey, you almost can't tell when the user stopped TXing.  Of course now 
with ADMs abound, I guess the squelch decay time isn't as important anymore.

>inconsistent with the OEM Micor circuitry.  Maybe they don't make that 
>much difference in real world use, but I'll bet my money on the original 
>Micor circuitry.
>
>YMMV...
>Kevin

FWIW, the adapted FXJ Micor squelch circuit is in use on at least 7 systems 
here on 220 & 440 MHz & has worked quite well for us.  The power supply 
filtering on pin 9 could be improved, though I think it was assumed that 
the power was from a "clean source", & in many cases is actually from the 
regulated 10 V bus of the G.E. MVP.

Bob NO6B


Reply via email to