> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:Repeater- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry C' > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 11:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antennas that work both in commercial > and amateur > > > > > >From: "Laryn Lohman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antennas that work both in commercial and > >amateur > >Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:45:51 -0000 > > > > > > > > > > it's also not a "stacked" so bear little relevence to the matter > > > >Trying to understand what "stacked" has to do with the discussion... > > > I am well aaware of what stacked means > > assume etc. > > > > > > > > > > There is little or no > > > >automatic penalty for using a non-resonant antenna. > > > > > > just some efficiency > > > >Barry, try to understand that a resonant antenna is not automatically > >efficient. And conversely that a non-resonant antenna is > >automatically inefficient. There is much mis-information out there, > >and it dies very slowly. > why not have a read of some of the wiki material about broadcasting that > we > have made availible ? > I have a understand suffucuent to have managed a living for some years in > the telecoms game .
I would venture a guess that there are a great number of people on this list that have/are making a living in the "telecoms game". Is there something unique about the broadcast industry that makes the laws of physics work differently than they do in the two way radio industry? Also note that time spent in any industry doesn't automatically make one an expert there either. Unless of course you have a PhD in that particular phase of that industry, then you may be eligible to be considered an expert on the subject. 73 Gary K4FMX
