Hi, Yes well I don't want to be responsible for either a "religious debate" or for starting a flame war so I'll have a look through the archives and do as you suggest...
Thanks David -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Sent: 17 February 2007 21:22 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Logic Hi true, don't want to get involved but personaly I use NHRC, does what I want resonable price, even when sent to the UK. As you say, sit down and decide what it needs to. Idealy as Dave is in the UK it will need to send CW ID every 15mins or so, have facilty for ctcss and 1750 toneburst, allthough ctcss could be inbuilt in the rx, like mine is. 73 Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: Nate Duehr To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 8:38 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Logic On 2/16/07, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have any of you got any suggestions based on what you have used and > perhaps what you might have done differently? So far I've looked at S- > Com, NHRC & ArCom but maybe there are others? Do any of these stand > out from the rest? Yes, but only in our own minds. LOL. This will simply turn into a "religious debate" thread, as it has before. There's plenty of fodder for the "which one is better than the other" debate in the archives. > I guess personal preference is going to come into it along the way > but your comments will be of great interest. Personal preference is everything -- once you get used to something you tend to stick with it. I find that sitting down with a nice cup of coffee and a couple of controller's printed manuals and a notepad to scribble on with ideas like... "If I wanted to do X, I'd have to ... " and documenting the wiring and the command structure needed to do X on a couple of different controllers, gives the best insight. Nate WY0X No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/691 - Release Date: 2/17/2007 5:06 PM
