For Scott:
 
With respect to using the GE MII mobile frame for repeater  applications:
 
1. Can  you say categorically that there is sufficient TX/RX shielding  to 
prevent any desense  at any power level the conversion is capable of  operating?
 
2. When these converted mobiles operate with reduced TX power, what happens  
to the output impedance of the TX? Is it still 50 ohms? If not, does this 
affect  the physical length of the half wave interconnect cables often 
suggested 
between  the TX and an isolator and/or the cavities?
 
3. If the output of the TX is other than 50 ohms as a result of a power  
level change,  does it upset the adjustment of the downstream isolator that  
has 
been tuned by a tracking generator?
 
Tks
 
Bruce
K7IJ
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 2/22/2007 7:02:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Ken,
 
We not only do complete repeaters, we can custom  build just about anything 
you want or need. We can simply build a rock-solid  high-quality 220 receiver 
for you. We have done several receivers in the past  that are rack mountable in 
a 2 unit rack space. I have a GE mastr II receiver  that I am just finishing 
up. It came out looking so nice that I am going to  take pictures as a show 
piece. Micor receivers would be VERY similar in  construction.
 
In my opinion, 2 things:
 
1. A Micor makes a much better repeater on 2M and  220 than a GE MII. (sorry 
GE loyalists!!) I think a Mastr II makes a much  better repeater on UHF (sorry 
Micor loyalists!!) I would suggest a Micor for  your 220 Machine.
 
2. If you're going to spend money on a new  receiver, why not spend a bit 
more and get a completely new machine. Think  about it, if your receiver is not 
100%, what's saying that your transmitter is  running at 100%? The notable 
thing about spectrum repeaters is that they lived  up to their name, they took 
up 
the WHOLE spectrum. This might even be what is  happing that you assume is a 
bad receiver. Instead of a bad receiver, you may  have a spurious transmitter 
that is totally wiping your receiver off the map.  Duplexers are meant to 
isolate, but there is only so much they can  isolate.
 
If you'd like a quote on a new machine or a quote  for a new receiver, feel 
free to e-mail or call.
 
Scott - Owner Repeater-Builder (the  company)
_www.repeater-www.repeaterwww.repeater_ 
(http://www.repeater-builder.com/custombuilt/) 
 
Scott Zimmerman 
Amateur Radio Call  N3XCC
474 Barnett Road
Boswell, PA 15531

----- Original Message ----- 
From: _Ken  Harrison_ (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])  
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:[email protected])   
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:39  PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 220  repeater receiver recommendations?



Thanks for the recommendation, Don. Though I'm sure a MastrII would
be  a great conversion for 220, we (in the group sense) want to try to
save  some of our money to get a remote base setup going on our
repeater, too.  Our small savings would be wiped out to replace the
entire repeater, in  spite of it being handy to have a complete spare
should there be a  problem in the future.

Thanks,
Ken

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(mailto:[email protected]) ,  "Don KA9QJG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Ken first of All I  noticed You stated Our group, so I would assume
You have
> others  kicking in to the Cost, I do not and I had Scott build Me up
a  220
> Repeater System, He did it in the process of Building a house  and
Moving All
> I had to do was Program the Controller, Hook up  the Amp, Power Supply
> Duplexers, and Ant, I have never had any  Problems for over a Yr.







<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.

Reply via email to