At 10:20 PM 02/23/07, you wrote:
>PL is no cure for interference or desence, it just hides it until
>someone actually tries to use the repeater.
>
> > Yep.  All the more reason to require PL'd inputs and make sure that
> > systems don't have compatible PL tones with the one on the reverse...

I never said it was - in fact I've made that point several times on
various pages on the repeater-builder web site.

But if you have two systems that normally can't hear each other, but
once in a while a band opening allows it, then you have to assume
that the coordinators did the best job that the could given the environment.
The system owners shouldn't be running a carrier squelch system, or
if they are, have PL decoders installed that can be enabled.
One of the local carrier squelch systems have an 82.5 decoder, and the
club newsletter plainly says something like "Our club repeater is carrier
squelch on (frequency), however circumstances may require a 82.5 tone.
We suggest that you program your radio for full time 82.5 encode."

My prior statement was made from the assumption that both were
established and coordinated systems. I said that if they are going
to be there, that they can at least NOT have the output tone of one
be the input tone of the other.

Mike WA6ILQ

Reply via email to