[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > BTW, these things need not triple or even double the price of a new radio, > as some have suggested. An extra pot for CTCSS deviation, decent CTCSS > decoders, higher IP3 front-end amps & mixer & more front-end filtering > would probably add $50-$100 to the cost of the radio at most. But when you > get in the mode of shaving every last penny off the cost of a design, > sooner or later you end up with nice-looking junk. What else can I do > other than once again complain to all the manufacturers at Dayton. Maybe > this will be the year they throw me out? > > Bob NO6B
Hmmm-how about a compromise-give us the choice of either a cheaper radio, or for those who need it, a higher end radio that has the better rx. Some of us can't afford $500 for a radio. Course, I don't understand getting new radios every year or two like many people do... -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL
