On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> as far as range goes......   take the square root of the distance  from the 
> ground to the base of your antenna and multiply it by 1.5 and that  would be 
> your range....     higher mo better....    allen....

In what units, Allen?  Didn't you have an obnoxious math or physics
teacher holler at you about providing the proper units (or deriving
them) for a particular problem in school?

Distance from the ground to base of antenna in ... Feet?  Inches?
Miles?  (that last one's a joke... but I can do it with a couple of
repeaters here, if you count the mountain they're sitting on...)

That will be your range in what... miles?  Kilometers?  Inches?
Astronomical Units?

Need to be a little more specific there to help him out...

I did some fast numbers to try to figure out how your rule of thumb
works... I decided to try the "tower" hight in feet...

Assuming...

A 5000' tower (mountain)... that gives a number of unknown units of 70.7106781.

Multiply that by 1.5, you get... 106.06601715.

So ... assuming the height WAS supposed to be given in feet, it would
appear to me that the "answer" is in miles?

106 miles of coverage is the only thing even close to being in the
ballpark for one of our mountaintop systems.  I can tell the answer's
not in Feet or AU's!  (GRIN)

Nate WY0X

Reply via email to