There's no easy answer to that question.  The two biggest factors to
consider when selecting the right value are:

a) What frequency range are you trying to filter out?  If your problem is
keeping an AM broadcast station out, you'll need larger values as compared
to targeting your own VHF/UHF emissions.

b) What is the source Z of the signal(s) being passed?  As the Z goes up,
you'll typically want less C lest you have roll-off problems in audio
circuits, "round off" of square-wave digital waveforms (generally not a good
idea to be filtering high speed digital circuits in this manner), etc.  If
the Z is fairly low, and if you're only dealing with AF and on/off logic
signals (COR, PTT, etc.), this becomes less of an issue.  But you should
still do the math before picking a value.

Feedthru caps are but one tool for fighting RF ingress.  The cap needs some
L or R to "work against" if it is to serve as part of a low-pass LC or RC
circuit.  Ferrite beads (of the approximate mix for the targeted frequency
ranges) and/or chokes may come into play as well.  Take a look at the
filtering on a fully-fitered Micor unified chassis station to get an idea of
Mother Mo's take on the subject.  IIRC, on the receiver interconnect there
are two feedthru caps (1000 pF?) with a choke between them on most, if not
all, circuits to/from the backplane.  I don't remember if all bands/models
used the same values for caps and chokes, maybe somebody else does.

                                        --- Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Hutchison
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 3:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Seeking feed thru' cap value.
> 
> What value of cap should be used as a minimum for TX RX controller 
> inter-connection. 1000pf, 5000pf?
> 
> Doug - GM7SVK
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.7/771 - Release 
> Date: 4/21/2007 11:56 AM
>  
> 

Reply via email to