http://www.batlabs.com/maratrac.html

Moto Maratrac is a decent platform but may not make the most reliable
repeater. They are essentialy a repackaged 16 ch (99 ch) Radius mobile with
a high power amp. The VHF and UHF radios are capeable of doing the agacent
ham bands without retuning as such the recivers have a wide front end and
may not be the best choice for high RF enviroments. The transmitter heat
sink aint enough for high duty cycle especially on UHF. Install fans and
give it a shot. 

 We had several in service (as mobiles) and most developed thier own
different quirks, I think it is due to dirty pins or connectors on the
system board.

The local Moto shop owner had one on his (Ham) Micor repeater as a remote
base and he could change channels up and down remotely by DTMF, it sounded
real good.

For hook up you could take apart the main conector plug and solder your
wires onto the corect pins and reassemble the plug.

Here is what needs to be done for a remote base Maratrac with A7 (99)ch
head.

Function Radio
{Cntrl Cable Radio Conn.}
Black/Shield Ground 8 AWG Black (Main Power)
 Tx Audio  J1 Pin 14

 PTT  J1 Pin 12

Rx Audio  J1 Pin 11
 
COR J1 Pin 18

If COR does not work ( I am prety sure ) you need to run a jumper from J20
pin 3 (telco/prog connector) on the radio chassis interconnect board (HLN
5343B),
to the negative side of C523 on the audio squelch board (audio PA mute).


Have fun.

tom n8ies






> [Original Message]
> From: k6kusman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 5/5/2007 9:10:56 PM
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] The Big M's Maratrac
>
> Hello all.. Does anyone have any info on the Moto Maratrac as related 
> to making a pair of them into a repeater or using them as remote 
> bases?. How hard are they to move to the ham bands as I have a few that 
> are 42-50, 150-164, 450,470. I have searced around the different sites 
> and can find almost no mention of the Maratrac. I would be interested 
> in hearing any info related to them. Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


Reply via email to