Rather than having to add on an airflow sensor of some ilk, there are two
other options that might be easier:

1.  Use fans that have a fail indication lead.  Most fans, especially the PC
variety, have a third wire that is used as a tachometer.  Most give two
squarewave pulses per rotation.  If your SCADA system can deal with that,
great.  If not, a simple RC circuit used as an integrator, perhaps in
conjunction with a comparator, would be simple enough to build.  Aside from
the tachometer types, there are other fans with locked-rotor indicators
instead of the tach, and others that have a low-speed warning indicator.  If
you do a few searches, you can probably find a fan with the appropriate
status output(s) to do whatever you want.

2.  Rather than relying on detection of the fan rotation/airflow, why not
use a thermostat instead (Klixon variety).  That way you know if your PA is
actually in the danger zone due to either a fan failure or site HVAC failure
or other condition that causes the temperature to go above the limit.

                                        --- Jeff
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam C. Feuer
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 11:21 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Recommendation - Vane Switch
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> I'm looking for information from anyone who has experience and could 
> recommend a good vane switch to be installed on several repeaters. 
> Some of my machines are 2 1/2 hours from my house so visiting them 
> often just doesn't happen.
> 
> I would like to install a vane switch to monitor the PA Fan and 
> connect the output of the switch into the sites SCADA system.
> 
> Manufacturer, model #, price, and opinion would be greatly 
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Adam N2ACF
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.14/912 - Release 
> Date: 7/22/2007 7:02 PM
>  
> 

Reply via email to