I was just commenting on the discussion of coordinators setting up schemes
such as in New England where half the repeaters are - input and half are +
input.  This can cause some interesting situations during the right band
conditions from machines in other parts of the country.

Glenn 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MCH
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 4:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF band opening

But, what would you realign it to? I believe PAVE PAWS covers the entire
band. There is no spectrum left to put them.

Maybe they can move up to 450-451 as long as they don't cause interference
to users there... (a dig on the D-STAR repeaters operating in non-repeater
bands due to 'no repeater band spectrum left and non-interference where they
are operating'). ;->

Joe M.

Glenn Shaw wrote:
> 
> Its pretty much a moot point now in most of New Eng due to Pave Paws. 
> Maybe it would be a good time forNESMC to realign things with all 
> these 440 repeaters going QRT.
> 
> Glenn N1GBY
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of MCH
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:12 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF band opening
> 
> I believe it was done to accomodate radios that would not TX well 
> below
> 445 MHz. Those repeaters could use LIHO and TX well between 447 and 450
MHz.
> 
> Yes, it's going to be 'fun' when the 12.5 kHz pairs come into use.
> 
> Joe M.
> 
> Bob Dengler wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know why the New England bandplan has inverted 70 cm 
> > pairs every 25 kHz (unlike the rest of the country, which is either 
> > all + or all
> > - 5 MHz)? 25 kHz isn't close enough for any adjacent channel issues 
> > to be a concern.
> >
> > Bob NO6B
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: 
> 9/18/2007
> 11:53 AM
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 


 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: 9/18/2007
11:53 AM



Reply via email to