I believe that, as long as he has the SSID turned on for the WiFi link, he's OK with the ID requirement.
How else would one ID on 2.4G WiFi?? Mark - N9WYS _____ From: [email protected] On Behalf Of Paul Plack ...or, if you're calling wifi a ham-band link, how you're ID-ing that sucker! - 73, Paul AE4KR ----- Original Message ----- From: Laryn Lohman <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Understood. For my question, I was thinking along the lines of using the 2.4G radios as a WiFi user, not as an Amateur user. I just wanted a clarification, because using 2.4G WiFi for a portion of a control link is no different than using a 49 mc. cordless phone, or a 1900 mc. cellphone to punch in DTMF to control your repeater. Last I saw, 49 mc. or 1900 mc. are not legal for Amateur Auxiliary usage. :-) NOT wanting to start a new discussion here, but at another time and place, I suppose we could discuss the legality of an autopatch where the above types of phones, or, say, a commercial microwave circuit, are carrying patch audio. See 97.113(e). <GRIN> Laryn K8TVZ --- In Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At 11/9/2007 07:01, you wrote: > > >Laryn, > > > >My only reason for thinking 2.4 G would not be legal for control it did > >not fall within the Auxiliary frequencies allowed for control or Telecommand. > > The entire 2.4 GHz amateur band is available for auxiliary stations. > > Bob NO6B >
