Thanks,

Living in BC here, we see quite a few Low Band UHF repeaters.  RCMP,
Forestry, Highways, to name a few, used low band UHF as link frequencies, so
when a hub repeater went up it was low band.  These have come out of service
now, because of narrow banding, and its just a matter if figuring out if
they'll work in the ham band.

Thanks,

Jesse




On 11/10/07, skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Hi Jesse,
>
> Working from a memory polluted by a few bad choices back in the
> late 70's... There should be three most common range of the UHF
> MSR-2000. The low UHF Range was about 409 to 430 MHz, the formal
> band edges escape me.
>
> The mid UHF range operation is 450 to about 490 typical. The
> T-Band Range operation was about 483 to 512 MHz.
>
> There are a number of differences in the PA by band segment
> and by version number. The TLE-xxxx "B versions" were much better
> than the TLE-xxxx "A versions". The harmonic filter was revised
> so it doesn't unsolder itself at the high current points and
> cause the PA to poop (fail).
>
> Both the ceramic substrates and the transistor "modules" change
> by band segment as does the harmonic filter.
>
> The 450-490 range PA is pretty good almost to 495 MHz in many
> examples & the 483-512 PA is not happy about going very far below
> the normal band edge. I have seen and used examples that operated
> well above their specified range but few work well below their
> band edge without reduced power, getting really hot or some other
> issue.
>
> Most of the low range UHF MSR units were made for places like
> Canada and special aps. Those binder manuals have the part numbers
> for those PA's as-built. And to add to the mix... many of those
> PA's are the low power ~40 watt packages. Trying to find the 110
> watt low range UHF PA is right up there with "hens teeth".
>
> cheers,
> skipp
>
>
> > "Jesse Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Was there ever a MSR 2000 built that covered the low UHF split
> 410ish to 440ish?
> >
> > I know of the 450-470, 470-494, 494-512 splits, but is there another
> > low band one?
> >
> > If so does anyone know the receiver part and PA part numbers for it?
> > Thanks,
> > Jesse
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to