That is exactly why I operate my own repeaters, with my own internet gateways.
------ Original Message ------ Received: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:39:18 PM CST From: "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage > Yep, the non-do-ers that want it all without lifting a finger for > maintenance time or even donating to the repeater fund. Others that are > involved have my permission to gripe. ;>} Nuff said 'bout dat. > > The real point that I wish to make is to not get to wild about building even > more infrastructure that has high failure rates. I use the K.I.S.S. method > mostly. Ya, right. Here I am on the computer again.... > > William A. Collister > N7MOG > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Repeater- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr > > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 3:21 PM > > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wide Area Coverage > > > > > > On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Bill wrote: > > > > > I kinda agree. Get used to the infrastructure systems and you can't > > > make a contact when it goes down, that's when the complaining > > > starts. i.e. cellphones and isp problems. Heck that's when real > > > amateur radio can shine! Heck, the complaints start even when "the > > > repeater" craps out. > > > > > > William A. Collister > > > N7MOG > > > > So you're complaining about the complainers? ;-) :-) > > > > -- > > Nate Duehr > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
