There is a DTV allocation in Harrisburg, PA for channel 2.

Originally, they were all going to be on UHF, but that changed.

Joe M.

Dan Hancock wrote:
> 
> It was my undeerstanding that all digital TV would be on UHF, no VHF
> and that the VHF spectrum would be re-allocated.
> Am I in error?
> 
> Dan N8DJP
> 
> --- In [email protected], MCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone else here seen the bull put out by NTIA on
> > https://www.dtv2009.gov/FAQ.aspx
> > =====================================================
> > 1.  What is the digital television transition?
> >
> > At midnight on February 17, 2009, all full-power television
> stations in
> > the United States will stop broadcasting in analog and switch to
> 100%
> > digital broadcasting. Digital broadcasting promises to provide a
> clearer
> > picture and more programming options and will free up airwaves for
> use
> > by emergency responders.
> > =====================================================
> >
> > "will free up airwaves for use by emergency responders."???
> >
> > The TV spectrum is being freed up by ANALOG stations and the SAME
> > SPECTRUM will be reused by DIGITAL stations. The only spectrum being
> > freed up by TV for PS use is on the 764 MHz + band. (two TV
> channels, I
> > believe) and has nothing to do with a transition to digital. The
> same
> > could have been achieved by simply moving those analog stations to
> other
> > channels.
> >
> > An analog allocation is 6 MHz. A digital allocation is 6 MHz.
> > How is digital saving spectrum?
> >
> > As there are some broadcast types here, maybe someone can explain
> the
> > technology used where X analog stations using 6 MHz each will be
> more
> > efficient by the same number of stations using 6 MHz each. Is this
> that
> > new math they are using?
> >
> > I would like to apply the same to 2M to get more spectrum out of
> it. If
> > I take my 16 kHz analog signal and make it 16 kHz digital, will we
> be
> > able to fit more repeaters in the band? (aside from the fact most
> will
> > have no users)
> >
> > Joe M.
> >
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to