Well, that at least confirms the time frame I thought it was in.... one step closer, anyway.
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 3:58 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's > At 1/19/2008 10:47, you wrote: > >>Can anyone point me to the specific enforcement case or warning letter >>where >>the FCC first said that regular, periodic repeater ID's irrespective of >>repeater usage were broadcasting and had to stop? The FCC's online >>archives > > I received such a warning letter back around the mid-80's. I'm sure I > still have it somewhere but can't dig it up right now. The text of the > "Notice of Station Operating Conditions" was along the lines of my > repeater > sent its callsign when no communications was taking place, & that the > repeater shall only ID in accordance with Part 97.xxx. > > The notice was prompted by numerous complaints to the FCC sent by users of > my repeater as well as a co-channelled repeater, each claiming > interference > from the "other" repeater. > > Bob NO6B
