On Feb 20, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Paul Finch wrote: > The link is correct, it is a new antenna for them and the picture is > an > artist rendering of the antenna, not an actual picture. They did > not do the > size justice. > > Paul
Ahh... interesting. Sounds like quite the beast. :-) Sorry if I sounded weird in the replies... the photo definitely looked pretty "normal", and that along with the whole, "hey, just tell 'em it's too big and they gotta pay for two spots" thought in the back of my head my have colored my response! (GRIN) 73, -- Nate Duehr, WY0X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
