I have bits and pieces of a manual, unfortunately that part I didn't have,
thanks Tony

Jesse



On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Tony Lelieveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>    Jesse,
>
> In the exciter description paragraph 2.1 TRANSMIT AUDIO CIRCUIT it states,
> "Exciter audio from the station control module (or test microphone) is
> applied to audio amplifier Q501, then routed to the clipper/pre-emphasis
> circuit of Q502 and Q503. etc. etc.  It's all there for you to read.  I do
> hope that you have a manual?
>
> 73, Tony VE3DWI
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jesse Lloyd
> *Sent:* April 14, 2008 19:44
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] MSR2000 Exciter audio pre-emphasis
>
>
>
> I know R1 card does have a de-emphasis circuit, but I thought that was
> for the local speaker only, and that repeat audio doesn't go through
> that card.
>
> Any idea which components in the exciter pre-emphasize the audio?
>
> Jesse
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Tony Lelieveld <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]<ve3dwi%40xplornet.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Jesse,
> >
> >
> >
> > The MSR2000 processes the audio, and does de-emphasis, on the "R1-Audio
> > board" before it goes through the various paths to the exciter where it
> gets
> > pre-emphasized.
> >
> > 73, Tony VE3DWI
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:[email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>]
> On Behalf Of Jesse Lloyd
> > Sent: April 14, 2008 13:23
> > To: [email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] MSR2000 Exciter audio pre-emphasis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > MSR2000 does the exciter do any pre-emphasis, or is the repeater
> > designed to use flat audio stock from Motorola? I know the local
> > speaker de-emphases audio, but repeat audio, does it get de-emphasised
> > then pre-emphasised at the exciter?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jesse
>
>  
>

Reply via email to