If you Run a 300 watt repeater  you do not need a
duplexer.
You Build the system with a Master site with the 300
watt transmitter in that rack you place several UHF
link receivers  and a voting system.
 then place  Receivers all over the place   Linked
back to the master site.
with a Duplexer  I would Not go more than 100 watts...

 repeater system

--- Ron Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Kevin,
> 
> The one issue here is the balance of repeater to
> user.  A user using an HT at 5 watts even with an
> outside or mobile antenna can be helped with a
> repeater receiver pre-amp that would otherwise
> extend receive range beyond a 50 W mobile, but allow
> a low power station access.
> 
> The repeater can make up for less desirable user
> rigs. Most repeaters must deal with many
> configurations of stations.
> 
> The initial comments dealt with running high power,
> 300 W, on a repeater with 50 W users.  Here as you
> said can help this user and balance the repeater
> tx/rx coverage.
> 
> 73, ron, n9ee/r
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Kevin Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: 2008/04/15 Tue AM 07:09:24 CDT
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] How much power
> should you run through a 350 W duplexer?
> 
> >                
> >Ron Wright wrote:  When running only 4 cavities
> this often happens even with 100 W better commercial
> rigs.  Running higher power does not make the
> repeater hear better, often hear less, and if you
> have users running typical 50W rigs why would one
> need 350 W?
> >It isn't impossible to have a well designed
> repeater with a good preampthat has a 6 to 10 dB of
> advantage over a mobile radio in a
> mobileenvironment, especially on 220.  Most would
> agree that the 'commercialstandard' of .35 uV
> sensitivity and 50 or 100 watts of power from
> arepeater is balanced to most mobile situations
> running similar power,and having similar receiver
> sensitivity.  Now, add a good preamp(something that
> gives a real 6 to 10 dB of receiver sensitivity) to
> awell designed repeater system and you have the need
> to run 200 to 400watts to regain being balanced.  
> >
> >A well designed repeater system will allow the
> desired system powerlevel to be run without
> desensing the receiver, and would hopefullyhave a
> few dB of additional isolation for times that upset
> the systemlike when the repeater antenna ices over.
> >
> >Kevin Custer
> >
> >
> >                                                                             
> >         
> 
> 
> Ron Wright, N9EE
> 727-376-6575
> MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
> Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
> No tone, all are welcome.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
>     (Yahoo! ID required)
> 
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Reply via email to