On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, lenaw12 wrote:
> The "company" Line (Federal Candy Company) is that your coordinated
> repeater trumps his "uncoordinated" repeater in a claim of
> interference.
This sounds as though the coordinating entity didn't do it's homework.
Either way, the coordinating entity HAS issued you a coordination for
the frequency, and you are in coordination and compliance. They
obviously have an obligation to determine what has occurred and issue a
correction -- either re-issuing a coordination to the other operator,
requesting the other operator implement a PL, or requesting that you
change your frequency.
>From my own perspective, I'd ask that you both WORK TOGETHER to find an
aimicable solution, as it's difficult enough to establish INFRASTRUCTURE
such as repeaters and locations for those repeaters. The fact that both
of you have managed to find places and locations to support those two
repeaters speak volumes in an of itself -- don't let both machines go to
waste through squabbling.
--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But remember, with no superpowers comes no responsibility.
--rly
