The question is frequency stability for fixed stations.  If the unit is 
operated as built (minus the phone patch) vs the possible use of an external 
amplifier as mentioned in the original post.  Just because the portable on 
which the unit is based is type accepted for portable use, the use of the same 
radio in a fixed station configuration could possibly fall under a different 
set of standards.  Be sure to consult the appropriate sections of the current 
version of Part 95.

MIlt
N3LTQ
  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Craig W Clark 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:35 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information 
about it.


  Huh? Since when is a GP300 not type accepted for GMRS? News to me, but I have 
been wrong before. (once!)



  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Milt
  Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:12 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information 
about it.



  Rick,



  The Systel was a 2 watt repeater with a telephone interconnect designed for 
small on-site systems.  I doubt that it would be type accepted for GMRS as it 
was based on one or more series of portables (HT-90 and/or GP300).  Of course 
the phone patch would not be usable on GMRS either.



  MIlt

  N3LTQ





    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Rick Beatty 

    To: [email protected] 

    Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:37 AM

    Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information 
about it.



    I recently was given a SYSTEL unit made by Motorola, on 464.../469... with 
duplexer and looks to be a repeater, with low level output (2w or so). Would be 
great for remote work on GMRS, does anyone on the group have data/information 
on this little cutie?

    Also I am looking for a schematic for an amplifier used with the portable. 
a UHF with the number N1275a? 

    thanks in advance -- 

    Rick 



   

Reply via email to