Thanks to all for your replies.

Joe M wrote
 "You need to reject the opposite TX on each repeater. Your BP 
filters were set wrong. You rejected the RX on the TX side - 
something the duplexer should be doing already. You need to install 
them in the repeater and reject the other TX. IOW, install a filter 
in the .16 repeater and notch the .36 TX. A good duplexer should do 
this as well, but many don't."

Joe that's what I thought I did. Maybe I did not make myself clear. I 
put a BPBR cavity rejecting 146.76 and passing 147.36 between the 
repeater transmitter and the duplexer at the 147.36 repeater.  This 
is where I was surprised that the  mixing got worse.  If I put the 
cavity in the wrong place let me know.

Eric Lemmon WB6FLY wrote
"The first question that enters my mind is, were both Micor stations
originally built as repeaters, with the extra filters and shielding 
plates,or are one or both base stations that have been converted to 
repeaters?"

I built our repeater. It's the 146.76 machine.  It was originally a 
pager TX. All shielding and the lo pass TX filter is in place. I have 
looked at it with a spectrum analyzer and see no other signal than 
146.76. I have no idea as to what the other repeater was made from. I 
will take a second look at their TX. The next time I go down there I 
plan to take a 50 watt radio and connect it to their duplexer to try 
to eliminate or prove their PA has a problem.

"The second question is,
are either or both repeaters equipped with ferrite isolators?"

The 146.76 has no isolator. The 147.36 has a brand new, I believe 
Sinclair, isolator that was factory built for this frequency. The 
isolator has no affect on the problem although I don't think it's 
installed properly. I did not notice when I was there but I think 
it's mounted on a steel plate. Also there in no cavity between it and 
the duplexer.  The mixing is there  with or without the isolator in 
line.  They paid big bucks thinking this would fix the problem. By 
the way they also replaced their antenna and feed line which may have 
made the mixing worse.

John wrote
"I hate to tell you, a definite way to eliminate 
the problem, is a frequency change so that the 
output of the two transmitters are no longer not 600 khz apart."

Funny that`s the first thing I told them. I am familiar with two 
pagers 600 khz apart and the havoc that can be raised.  

I plan to go back down there when I have time and let the group know 
what I find.
Again thanks to all.


Reply via email to