In the early '70s I coordinated a repeater in Texas(146.985) between a 146.97 
repeater in Dallas and a 147.70 repeater near Sherman.  One was 50 miles and 
the other about 40 miles away.  My coordination required that I not have any 
complaint from either already established repeater to continue my operation.  I 
operated this repeater for quite a few years before Texas shifted to a 20 kHz 
spacing plan, when I was assigned a 147.16 frequency.  I never had any 
complaint while using a Spectrum transmitter and receiver which I had assembled 
on a chassis with a homebrew controller.

I am sure that many of the CA repeaters using this band plan operate without 
any problems, so it is a workable band plan, proved many times.

73 - Jim  W5ZIT

--- On Wed, 3/25/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 9:54 PM











    
            At 3/25/2009 15:35, you wrote:

>Back in the day, a channel was 30 kHz wide. When they were split to meet 

>demand, California was not the only coordination jurisdiction which chose 

>to put the "half channels" upside down. From what I gather from the 

>old-timers, it was easier to protect your input from a single, consistent 

>signal, (the other repeater's output,) 15 kHz off your input but far away, 

>than it was to deal with an ever-changing pool of users who could be right 

>under your site, trying to work the distant repeater with high power and 

>frequency tolerance inferior to the distant repeater.



Precisely, Paul.  Glad to see others have figured out the reasoning behind 

our oft-trashed bandplan.  The best part is that with a little extra 

planning & spec'ing, 60 or even 40 mile separation isn't necessarily 

required to make it work, although you've got to use good equipment - no 30 

kHz channel-spec' d radios without modifications.



>California had to be first in finding solutions to many band-crowding 

>issues. Maybe hams there will be the first to narrow-band?



Our 4 D-Star pairs are spacing @ 10 kHz; no interference complaints so far.



Bob NO6B




 

      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

Reply via email to