Tim,

A high-gain antenna that is only 100 feet away horizontally is far too
close.  It is "bathing" your repeater equipment with RF, and very few
machines can tolerate being in such a high RF field.

Vertical versus horizontal separation is very roughly in a 1:45 ratio, that
is, the isolation of 100 feet of vertical separation is roughly equivalent
to about 4,500 feet of horizontal separation.  In other words, your 100 feet
of horizontal separation is no better than if you put a mag-mount whip right
on the top of the repeater cabinet.

You would likely have less desense if you mounted your DB224 antenna on the
roof of your equipment shed, directly above the repeater, so that the
repeater cabinet was in the "shadow" beneath the antenna.  You might also
consider filtering the DC power leads to prevent RF ingress through that
path.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of tahrens301
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antenna SWR = Desense?

  

Hi Eric,

Hmmm, don't think I said above the station, but if I implied
it, no, it's horizontal. I can look out the window & see it!

Nate - I only tried the 'ham quality' antenna because I knew
it would be a better match than the DB224. It was easy
to change, standing on a 6' ladder! Just wanted to see if
a poor swr would induce the desense.

There are no other communications systems within miles of
my location, so who knows. Perhaps the metal building is
the problem.

A side question, dealing with separation.

Obviously, when you are using a split site, vertical separation
makes you a lot more $ than horizontal does.

But, in this type of situation, where you are a single antenna with
a duplexer, what real difference does vertical or horizontal
separation from the station make? If I'm horizontal, & could
turn the whole system on it's side (including the antenna system),
then it would be vertical.

The straws that I'm grasping are getting smaller!!

Thanks to all!

Tim W5FN

Reply via email to