http://www.amtronix.com/e8285a.htm

Pros over the 8924C: The display color CRT is replaced by a EL panel,
lower burn in. Duplex and Antenna connectors are N instead of BNC,
better frequency range (older units)

Cons: Spectrum Analyzer Is Optional, No Squelch knob, No auto
frequency counter, 2.5W max input, does not decode DPL, LTR or EDACS.
Bigger than 8924C

But for these prices you cant complain that much

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Jeff DePolo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The older ones were general-coverage like the 892x series (100 kHz to 1 GHz,
> and 1700-2000 or something like that).  The newer ones were limited to the
> cellular and PCS bands.  It's not only a difference in firmware but also
> hardware (i.e. you can't take one of the newer ones and back-rev the
> firmware), so you have to be careful when buying.
>
>                                --- Jeff WN3A
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of wd8chl
>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:41 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HP E-8285A Service Monitor
>>
>>
>>
>> Sid wrote:
>> > I recently acquired a HP E-8285A CDMA test set and it
>> appears to make
>> > an excellent radio service monitor.. They are becoming available on
>> > the surplus market at bargin basemant prices, Anyone else have one
>> > that would like to exchange notes? Sid.
>>
>> Well, I was curious, and from the specs, it looks like the
>> only ham band
>> it will work on is 902-928 MHz.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.426 / Virus Database: 270.14.102/2556 - Release
>> Date: 12/11/09 10:06:00
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to