Next question

what channel spacing are you tuning them for ?

Merrill
KG4IDD

On 1/28/2010 8:56 PM, tahrens301 wrote:
> Hi Merrill,
>
> Yep, that's what the label says.
>
> Now, gotta figure out why they aren't
> living up to specs.
>
> Tnx
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], Merrill<kg4...@...>  wrote:
>    
>> Tx-Rx model 28-41-05 "Vari-Notch" pseudo-pass, notch
>> duplexer.
>> This is the appx two RU duplexer for wide split repeaters,
>> Comprised of five of the two inch square cavities.
>> Tx-Rx manual says 2.5 mhz spacing.
>> Tag says Tx 1.5 dB insertion for 76 dB isolation, and Rx is 1.1 dB for
>> 110dB(Tx is 76dB at Rx and Rx is 110 at Tx)
>> Three cavities on Rx, two on Tx.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/28/2010 8:28 PM, tahrens301 wrote:
>>      
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I forgot to put the model number in the original
>>> posting!
>>>
>>> It's 28-41-05
>>>
>>> It has 3 of the blocks in the TX line, and 2 in the
>>> RX.  It's in a 2 1/4" thick rack panel.
>>>
>>> I opened one up, and it looks like a helical resonator
>>> with a silver slug that goes in and out, and the BNC
>>> connectors have a loop that is 90 degrees to the larger
>>> coil and has an air variable cap to ground.
>>>
>>> thanks!
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In [email protected], "Rob Lee"<rob@>   wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> The duplexer that you have may not be a "Vari-Notch" unit. Your description
>>>> sounds like a "30 series" unit (Model number will start with a 30 e.g.
>>>> 30-36-01A)
>>>>
>>>> The 30 series VHF duplexers are specially designed to work with repeaters
>>>> that exhibit problems when connected to high selectivity duplexers. This
>>>> design uses three standard notch type filters on the transmitter side which
>>>> provide excellent noise filtering while maintaining a relatively low VSWR
>>>> over a wide frequency range. This helps minimize transmitter sensitivity to
>>>> cable length between the duplexer and the transmitter and also reduces the
>>>> potential for transmitter spurs.
>>>>
>>>> The receiver portion of the duplexer incorporates three pseudo bandpass
>>>> filters to give isolation to the transmit carrier and reduce interference
>>>> and intermodulation caused by other nearby transmitters.
>>>>
>>>> Because different types of cavity filters are used for the transmit and
>>>> receive sides of the duplexer, it is important that the correct model be
>>>> used. Model numbers are different for units designed for either the
>>>> transmitter higher or lower than the receiver frequency.
>>>>
>>>> I have tuning instructions if this sounds like the unit.
>>>>
>>>> Rob K7TGU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "tahrens301"<tahrens@>
>>>> To:<[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 15:37
>>>> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] VHF Vari-Notch Duplexers - 2" x 2" x 4" ???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> Well, I thought this thing was tuned up,
>>>>> but obviously something is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are a set of the 2x2x4" cavities...
>>>>> have a plunger in the front, and a variable
>>>>> cap adjustment on the back.  Also, a pair of
>>>>> BNC connectors on the capacitor side.
>>>>>
>>>>> The plate says Duplexer Vari-Notch,
>>>>> 147-174
>>>>>
>>>>> It also implies that the TX has a 1.5dB
>>>>> insertion loss, but darned if I can get
>>>>> only about 4.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've talked to the guys at TX/RX, and they
>>>>> are looking for a book on them, but nothing
>>>>> yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody have any tuning instructions/info on
>>>>> them?
>>>>>
>>>>> The plunger is marked 'pass low', and the cap
>>>>> is reject high.  Pretty much self explanatory,
>>>>> and they tune ok, but the insertion loss is
>>>>> higher than it appears it should be.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>      
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>    

Reply via email to