I think the yellow top optimas are for deep cycle apps. Check their website. 

Va2ir
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "tahrens301" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:11:05 
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Battery system for portable repeater (non solar)

Are the optima type batteries meant for extended deep
discharges?

Tim



--- In [email protected], "KD8BIW" <sdenn...@...> wrote:
>
> Something such as an Optima Yellow top battery would be okay in this use.  
> They are sealed, spillproof AGM batteries.  Keep them at their "float" 
> voltage and you should not have a problem.  Use these for battery back-up at 
> numerous repeaters and have not had a problem (yet...).  Good luck and let us 
> know what you come up with, and how it works for you!
> 
> Steve
> 
> --- In [email protected], Tim Ahrens <tahrens@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eric/all,
> > 
> > It is on a totally different frequency, and licensed as a mobile -
> > within a 24km radius around the center of our district.
> > 
> > All the fire repeaters in the county have the same output &
> > input frequencies, just have different input PLs.  Kind of a
> > pain to go to direct with some older radios... e.g. X9000
> > which when you push the 'dir' button, it uses the TX PL.
> > 
> > Laryn - these were some pretty high dollar units, so I
> > wouldn't have expected them to fry the batteries.
> > 
> > I'll look into the AGM bats - the rptr draws about 450
> > mA in RX, and about 4A in TX.
> > 
> > Getting a Pelican case for the repeater & cables, but
> > not sure how to make the battery transportable.. I
> > suppose if it's 'really' sealed, then I wouldn't have to
> > worry about leakage of the electrolyte - could use
> > a case for it & the charger.
> > 
> > Any recommendations about appropriate & 'sure-fire'
> > chargers for one of these?  I could put together something
> > for float charging, but there will also be a need for 'real'
> > charging as well.
> > 
> > Thanks again,
> > 
> > Tim
> >
>



Reply via email to