I should have realized that since I think there are base frequencies below the UHF coverage that work.
Regardless, it's a problem with the calculation and won't work. Thanks for the correction. Joe M. Greg Beat wrote: > > > It would be a very interesting court case in this state (Illinois). > Illinois is where "Air rights" were established 100 years ago -- > above railroad right-of-way (that railroad could and did sell). > > It was the communication attorneys (and FCC) that used that landmark > ruling -- to > permit and enforce the encryption of TVRO satellite broadcasts in early > 1980s -- > after the late 1970s boom in C band dishes (big 10' dishes). > > The FCC has "set themselves up" due to their deregulation boom of 1980s > (breakup of AT&T 1984; bow to NAB pressure and creation of GROL/reduce > engineering requirements for commercial > broadcast stations; passing Citizens Band enforcement service to local > law enforcement). > ADD to this the Patriot Act, Homeland Security and other laws quickly > passed during post-9/11 reaction -- > and it would be a lively debate and court case. > > Current anti-federal government pushes by Tea Party and conservative > groups refocus on 10th amendment -- > almost guarantee a mixed decision (conflicts in existing laws -- which > takes precedent and in what circumstances). > Yes, FCC has authority -- BUT if it is a matter of public safety -- is > that the exception? > > While the First Amendment upholds Freedom of Speech -- it does not > uphold a person that yells "Fire" in a crowded theatre -- > causing a panic and injury -- when there was no fire! > > w9gb > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2701 - Release Date: 02/21/10 > 02:34:00 >
