I appreciate the contribution of the information found in the ARRL April 1962 
QST article, which I have reviewed, and the technical parameters of impedance 
matching provided, however the information presented relates to the shortening 
of a 1/2 WL simple dipole from the resonant freq. terminal impedance of 72+j0 
to achieve a terminal Z = 50-jXC and the subsequent removal of the XC component 
with a shunt XL Hairpin matching device. 
The gnd plane antenna in the original discussion has a 1/4 WL vertical 
radiating element terminal impedance of 36+j0. Any reduction of the length will 
result in a lower R component as well as to introduce shunt XC. If the 
1/4 radiator was reduced in length proportionally as the 1/2 WL antenna was, it 
would have a terminal impedance of 50 divided by 72 or 0.694 times 36, 
resulting in a R component of about 25 Ohms. 
This is obviously is going the wrong way to achieve a suitable match for a 50 
Ohm system.  There is no way no how that the 36 Ohm 1/4 WL vertical radiator in 
a gnd plane antenna can be made to match 50 Ohms by the addition of a shunt XL 
component. 
Construction of the impedance on a Smith Chart verifies this. Only a series 
transmission line with a shunt reactance can get a impedance match to a 50 Ohm 
system.
I would be happy to submit a Smith Chart with the appropriate series 
transmission line and location of the shunt stub illustrated. 
a.
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, skipp025 <[email protected]> wrote:


From: skipp025 <[email protected]>
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Ground plane yada yada
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 3:57 PM


  



> "Al Wolfe" <k...@...> wrote:
>
> The straight skinny about the "beta" or "hairpin" match 
> can be found in a QST article, April 1962, by Gooch and 
> Gardiner. It explains how this matching scheme works. The 
> driven element is shortened making it capacitive. 

> Then the inductive reactance of the hairpin or beta 
> section re-resonates the element by canceling the 
> capacitive reactance of the shortened element while 
> raising the feedpoint impedance at the same time. Theory, 
> formulae, and practical examples are all in the article.
> 
> The inverse is also desribed in the article where the element 
> is lengthened to make it inductive and a series capacitor 
> used to re-resonate the antenna.
> 
> Both of these methods have been used for years to manipulate the 
> feedpoint impedence of an antenna. The beta does have the 
> advantage of presenting a DC ground.
> 
> Al, K9SI

Bingo and thank you Al. 
s. 






Reply via email to