I believe the ARRL did. I posted the link to it in an earlier message.
 
Richard
www.n7tgb.net <http://www.n7tgb.net/>  

Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. 
-- Ronald Reagan 
 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Struebel
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm
Band


  


Regarding the orginal R&O, does anyone have access to the comments that were
received by the FCC on this proposal?  Did the ARRL comment on it?
 
Dave WB2FTX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: kg6ziu <mailto:[email protected]>  
To: Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:[email protected]>
yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 6:49 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm Band

  

Laryn and others,

Here is the link to the R&O #08-63 . Please notice the dates on this-it was
in 2008... I do not think that the FCC should grant this at all, but we need
to let our representatives know both at the ARRL, FCC and
senators/congresscritters know that we find this encroachment unacceptable.
Maybe they should take over UPS's claim on the 220 band...

Phil KK6PE
http://fjallfoss.
<http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1077A1.txt>
fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1077A1.txt 

--- In Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com, "larynl2" <lar...@...> wrote:
>
> Anyone have a real link to this? Those of us on the Web do not get
attachments...
> 
> Laryn K8TVZ





  _____  





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2722 - Release Date: 03/04/10
14:34:00



Reply via email to