You are correct Eric.  Did put a pig tail on just to see what it would do.  100 
watts of spurs and other messy junk.  I was thinking of building a filter that 
could go between the exciter and the PA. Not sure how that would work out tho.

Its looking like I have a UHF MSR2000 that is useless at this point.  Unless I 
can find a low spit exciter in hopes that FL101 will tune up.  There is a Moto 
rep in town.  Going to look into maybe getting a new filter that will work, and 
replacing it.  Not to many options at this point.  

--- In [email protected], "Eric Lemmon" <wb6...@...> wrote:
>
> Jason,
> 
> You definitely should not bypass FL101, because it performs an important
> function.  Although the service manual does not provide any information
> about tuning FL101, the schematic diagram reveals that it contains four
> helical resonators that do appear to have tuning slugs which act as variable
> capacitors.  As you have noted, the stock tuning favors the 450-470 MHz band
> for which the station is designed.  I have not done this myself, but perhaps
> other readers can advise you on the means and method of adjusting FL101 to
> pass a carrier near 440 MHz.  You will likely have to carefully remove the
> filter cover in order to reach the slugs.
> 
> 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of kc7stw
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] MSR2000 UHF exciter (update)
> 
>   
> 
> Hello again.
> 
> So after messing with the exciter. (last post on this topic the exciter only
> put out .1 mw) 
> 
> The exciter will put out, 300mw to the input of FL101. This is just a simple
> tune up. But FL101 blocks the RF 'since it seems to be out of range'.
> 
> Can the filter be re-build, changed, by passed, and a external filter used,
> etc?
> 
> Also, at this point. Anyone have a UHF exciter that will play nice at
> 440.300 that they want to sell? or trade for a exciter that plays nice in
> the upper 70cm range?
> 
> Thanks
> -Jason
>


Reply via email to