I saw one several years ago - the guy started with a
MSR base station that had been toasted after the
antenna was struck by lightning (i.e. toasted the
PA deck and the receiver front end transistor).

He converted the receiver and exciter to 220, and I
don't have the conversion information (if I did there
would be a 220 Mitrek / 220 MSR conversion article).

The technique is the same as a Mitrek mobile since
the MSR receiver and exciter are essentially each
a half of a Mitrek main board.

The MSR PA deck heat sink was stripped and three
220MHz power bricks bolted to it. The first one took the
exciter output and amplified it enough to drive a Wilkinson
power divider, which drove two bricks. He used teflon
circuit board and etched the divider tuned lines onto it.
The two bricks drove a Wilkinson divider in reverse (i.e.
a combiner) which drove the RF output jack.

There was a shared receive antenna (three separate 220
systems used it) at 100 feet and a dedicated transmit
antenna at about 40 feet.

There was a single 220 MHz cavity between the exciter
and the PA deck, and I don't know if it was to clean up
the exciter or for some other reason (perhaps notching
out a bit of grunge on the receiver input?).

The modified unit was re-labeled as a C73 1/2 GRB - that
was an inside joke as Motos model number definition
system used a 3 for high band and a 4 for UHF, so a 3 1/2
had to be 220 Mhz.

The converted base station played on 220 for years and
ran totally solid. It was connected to one port of an
RC850 with a 2m and 440 remote base on another port.
I lost track of the unit when the owner passed away and
a couple of months later it evaporated from the building.

So somewhere "out there" is a 220mhz MSR2000.

Mike WA6ILQ

At 08:43 PM 04/05/10, you wrote:
>If it can be done with a VHF MSR I would like to know, since I have 
>two of them sitting around doing nothing. ;)
>
>--- In [email protected], "WA2RJP" <jlang...@...> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone attempted or succeeded in converting a VHF MSR2000 to 
> 220? I'd rather not reinvent the wheel if someone already has done or tried.
> >
> > tnx,
> >
> > Jim

Reply via email to