> I've never seen anyone have real success with those chips in > that application. http://www.hamtronics.com/pdf/TD-3.pdf > Frankly, I think the internal components in the IC do not > have the tolerance and stability to handle it, so no amount of > high-tolerance components on the outside will make it usable. wrong > They were never designed for that purpose anyway. They were > for broad decode app's in the audible range...cheap. Like a > 1050Hz decoder in a weather radio. A little extra time with the mfgrs data sheets would yield usable results. s.
- [Repeater-Builder] CTCSS Encoder/Decoder James
- RE: [Repeater-Builder] CTCSS Encoder/Decoder Stanley Stanukinos
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] CTCSS Encoder/Decoder wd8chl
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] CTCSS Encoder/Decoder va2ir
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS Encoder/Decoder skipp025
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] CTCSS Encoder/Decoder Chuck Kelsey
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS Encoder/Decoder skipp025
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS Encoder/D... Chuck Kelsey
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS Encod... no6b
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS Encoder/D... skipp025
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS ... James Cicirello
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS ... ae6zm
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re... N1BUG
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re... Eric Grabowski
- [Repeater-Builder] Re: Di... skipp025