<div class="plainMail">Inserting a tee connector in an arbitrary point on a 
transmission line with an open or short circuited stub to obtain an acceptable 
reduction in the VSWR on the line is next to impossible and is typically an 
exercise in futility (which you apparently have learned).<BR><BR>The only way 
to guarantee having a substantial reduction in VSWR is to first measure the 
Z=R+/-jX at the connector, plot the measured R+/-jX on a Smith Chart or into a 
Smith Chart computer program, determine if there needs to be a modification in 
the line length and then add a Tee adapter with a shorted or open circuit stub 
of a length indicated by the Smith Chart. This is not a simple or easy process 
for the uninitiated user.<BR><BR>Allan Crites&nbsp; wa9zzu<BR><BR><BR><BR>--- 
On Sat, 5/8/10, WA3GIN &lt;<a ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; 
href="/mc/[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; 
wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; From: WA3GIN &lt;<a
 ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; 
href="/mc/[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;<BR>&gt; 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Commercial VHF antenna on 2m<BR>&gt; To: <a 
ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; 
href="/mc/[email protected]">[email protected]</a><BR>&gt;
 Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010, 11:13 PM<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; 
<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; 
<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp; <BR>&gt;  <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; 
<BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp; 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt;&nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; 
<BR>&gt; Hi folks,<BR>&gt;  <BR>&gt; Several weeks ago I posed<BR>&gt; the 
question of using a <BR>&gt; Commercial VHF antenna that was resonant on 154Mhz 
on<BR>&gt; 146.745Mhz.  We tried <BR>&gt; it
 today. The SWR was a bit over 2:1 on the repeater freq.<BR>&gt; We installed a 
T <BR>&gt; connector after the cans and used an open stub to try to<BR>&gt; 
match the line...got it <BR>&gt; down to 1.5:1, wouldn't go any lower. <BR>&gt; 
 <BR>&gt; We think the height of the<BR>&gt; antenna makes up for <BR>&gt; what 
we suspect is a lot of loss in the antenna. The<BR>&gt; previous location of 
the <BR>&gt; repeater antenna was 100ft ASL and this location is 525ft<BR>&gt; 
ASL. Maybe one day <BR>&gt; we'll get a chance to retune the four 
dipole<BR>&gt; antenna.<BR>&gt;  <BR>&gt; Thanks to all that<BR>&gt; provided 
ideas for this <BR>&gt; project.<BR>&gt;  <BR>&gt; 73,<BR>&gt; dave<BR>&gt; 
wa3gin<BR>&gt;  <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp; 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&nbsp; 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; 
<BR>&gt;&nbsp; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;
 <BR>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; 
<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;<BR></div>

Reply via email to