Naaaa. Just saying Murphy is on the list: "If there is a topic you are 
interested in, it will come up just as you get busy with something else."

Joe M.

wb6dgn wrote:
> 
> "We were waiting for you to get busy with something else. :-P"
> 
> Are you trying to tell me I was hogging the board?  Sorry, I'll behave!
> 
> --- In [email protected], MCH <m...@...> wrote:
>> We were waiting for you to get busy with something else. :-P
>>
>> Joe M.
>>
>> wb6dgn wrote:
>>> Hey, guys!  I'm trying to rewire my workbench area and I can't keep my mind 
>>> on what I'm doing, thinking about this subject!  Where were you guys when I 
>>> had nothing else to do???  Nuts!  Back to the workbench.
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> --- In [email protected], "wb6dgn" <wb6dgn@> wrote:
>>>> Also, wouldn't Carson's rule mitigate that characteristic?
>>>>
>>>> --- In [email protected], MCH <mch@> wrote:
>>>>> I would agree with the quality issues, but does that really equate to 
>>>>> unintelligibility on any significant scale?
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe M.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>>>>>>   On 8/27/2010 8:18 PM, wb6dgn wrote:
>>>>>>> If you reduce the modulation without reducing the receiver bandwidth, 
>>>>>>> then, yes, the range will be reduced.  You have reduced the signal 
>>>>>>> without also reducing the noise.  However, if you reduce the modulation 
>>>>>>> and, at the same time, reduce the receiver bandwidth and audio 
>>>>>>> recovery, by a like amount, then I do not see how the signal:noise 
>>>>>>> ratio, and therefore range, would change appreciably.
>>>>>> Relationships aren't linear, or you'd be right. Reducing the modulation 
>>>>>> index and simultaneously reducing the receiver bandwidth from 5 to 2.5 
>>>>>> kHz results in a situation which requires ~6 db more signal level for 
>>>>>> the same demodulated quality (ex. 12db SINAD)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthew Kaufman
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to