On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:56:04 +0000 Fil Lupin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > following my answer > > https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/replicant/2020-March/002617.html I > think some tools could be useful to automatize some tests, in order > to focus on complex checkings. These tools exists for several > languages ( > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis#C,_C++) > : > > - python : > [...] flake8 [...] > [...] pylint [...] > [...] bandit [...] I don't know the difference between all of them so I started looking at the practical side, and they are all packaged in GuiX, Hyperbola, Parabola and Trisquel 8. I've not checked PureOS though. They are probably packaged in many other GNU/Linux distributions as well. I think this is important for selecting tools as it makes things much more simple: - They could be installed very easily on contributors distributions. - They could also easily be installed in a Replicant vm. - The FSDG compliant GNU/Linux distributions have them, so freedom wise, it should be good enough. Denis.
pgpoHO2rEs4KU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Replicant mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/replicant
