On 22 Sep 2014, at 15:31 , Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Jan, I know I talked about this with you in private. I wont surface > that convo here without your permission. > > One of the things I wanted to do is strongly "brand" the replication > protocol. Max Ogden called his sketch SLEEP. I thought we might want > to do something similar, call this the Couch Replication Protocol > (CRP) or some such. We can then say that CouchDB is the reference > implementation. And other tools (*waves to PouchDB*) can claim > compatibility with the CRP.
Yup, +1, all that, make Couch Replication or Couch Sync a thing and host it prominently on couchdb.apache.org. I know I convinced Benjamin about this plan way back when :) > > On 22 September 2014 15:28, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 22 Sep 2014, at 15:25 , Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What is the provenance of replication.io? Is that under the project's >>> control? >> >> no, it is Ben Young / Cloudant. >> >> I suggest we retire it and move any of the relevant content to >> couchdb.org/replication (if not the home page outright). >> >> Jan >> -- >> >>> >>> On 20 September 2014 22:55, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> But instead of snark, I thought I'd ask here. What is Damien referring >>>>> to exactly, and what can we do to increase that from 5 to 50? >>>> >>>> 1. Finish the docs >>>> 2. Update replication.io/ >>>> 3. Spread the word about >>>> 4. Support custom implementations >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ,,,^..^,,, >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Noah Slater >>> https://twitter.com/nslater >> > > > > -- > Noah Slater > https://twitter.com/nslater
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
