On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:47:48 -0400 Richard wrote: > let's shorten it as > - C5 - No other license is recommended over GPL 3-or-later.
that inversion is perfect - it is not only shorter, it is more clear, that C5 is reasonably trivial to pass, if only by not "recommending" or "encouraging" _any_ licensing that is the most common case - notabug is the only one i know of, which makes any attempt to "recommend" or "encourage" any licensing - but that is only indirectly; because notabug forbids non-free licenses generally > - A2 - Recommends GPL 3-or-later over others i left A2 undecided for notabug; because its not clear what that entails - probably that would only be evident in the form of documentation - for example, would it be sufficient to pass A2, if i convinced the notabug admin to add a line to the ToS, or the license selector, like: "we recommend that your choose the GPLv3-or-later" if so, then why not add a new criteria at the A+ level: "we recommend that your choose the AGPLv3-or-later"
