On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:53:02 -0400 Richard wrote: > Can you get a final evaluation ready for any of the sites we > have been looking at?
yes - i have been reviewing all of the discussion on this list since march, and condensed them into a summary report - there were about 20 different topics discussed, across a small number of threads, which was confusing to people - it took quite some time to compile a summary - hopefully that will serve get sort out the issues and put the separate discussions on track - it includes several items which could be made into concrete patches, or implemented by the GNU webmasters immediately https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-05/msg00000.html as for the new entries, at this point, there is enough verified information to add both notabug.org and sr.ht the wiki checklists serve well, both as a final evaluation, and to as a central reference to assist with future re-evaluations * adding notabug.org -> conclusion: affirmative, grade 'C' note: only a trivial bug is preventing grade 'B' per: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Notabug * adding sr.ht -> conclusion: affirmative, grade 'B' per: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Sourcehut
