attached is a patch to change the A4 criteria, per:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00058.html
Index: software/repo-criteria.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/repo-criteria.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 repo-criteria.html
--- software/repo-criteria.html 24 Jun 2016 21:37:15 -0000 1.12
+++ software/repo-criteria.html 14 Jun 2021 18:43:52 -0000
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@
<li id="A3"><p>Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option.
<strong>(A3)</strong></p></li>
- <li id="A4"><p>Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license) for
- works for practical use. <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>
+ <li id="A4"><p>Does not permit non-free licenses for publicly-accessible repos.
+ <strong>(A4)</strong></p></li>
<li id="A5"><p>Does not recommend services that
are <a href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html">SaaSS</a>.
