On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:58:38 -0400 Richard wrote: > Should B2 reject sites that say nothing about licensing options?
yes, i think so - one of the criteria should require adequate documentation, at least for for the most common Free Software licenses - non-free licenses and "no license" are permitted at the B level (A4 requires free licenses only); so the documentation should not need to be exhaustive - just a decent effort to explain the ones that 98% of projects use (BSDs, MITs, GPLs, MPLs, apaches, CCs, etc) the github choose-a-license documentation is freely-licensed; and we agreed that it is comprehensive enough; though you thought there were a few discrepancies regarding the GPLs - with a bit of tweaking, the choose-a-license documentation could be a simple drop-in for B2-1 - so this would not be unreasonable to ask of hosts; because they would not even need to write it themselves, only to host it how about this wording: > + <li id="B2-1"><p>Explains the most common Free Software licenses, > + distinguishing between GNU 2 only and GPL 2-or-later,
