Hi Pau >> The free software movement is a campaign for a moral goal: > > No. As long as you consider it acceptable to throw some people under the > bus, as long as you call not doing that a "feature", your goal, whatever > else it may be, is *not* moral and will never be, repeated claims to the > contrary notwithstanding. What people under the bus?
>> to end an injustice. > > "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" (Martin Luther > King). Since you consider acceptable to perpetuate an injustice (and > arguably reinforce it, by giving it another stronghold), your approach > is flawed to the core, and you're defending the indefensible. What injustice? > Then, since you happily ignore and perpetuate one wrong while claiming > to fight to end another, you're not fighting to end wrongs, plural. That > would mean your own goal is not a moral one. What is being ignored? > Yes, software (like websites) that gives certain people, like the FSF, > power over the users, by letting it selectively deny access to some of > us (aka, people with disabilities), is indeed a matter of good vs. evil. Pau, since when is FSF website unfriendly toward people with disabilities? I find it more useable than many other websites. S
