[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I suggest considering whether a higher priority > should be to release the criteria updates as version 1.2. If this were simply a work of thought and scholarship, with nothing depending on it practically, that might be a good choice. But we have a practical need to say something about codeberg. We know that codeberg gets a passing grade. We just don't know which grade. We know that codeberg is much better than GitHub or GitLab.com. We need to say this to the public! So I am looking for someone to prepare an evaluation of codeberg based on what we actually have concluded, and leaving explicit gaps for the questions that we can't answer easily. This should be pretty easy -- would someone please do that? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
