Hi Moritz, On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 13:12, Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:10:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:52:44PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > reporting against kernel, automatically is switched to report against >> > linux-image. So, should we remove even linux-image (it's not in teh >> > official list of pseudo-packages nowdays)? I think so, but better be >> > sage than sorry :) >> >> I hadn't known about linux-image. I've send the BTS owners a mail to remove >> this pseudo package as well, so please remove it from reportbug likewise. > > According to Don Armstrong there is no linux-image pseudo package, so > the special treatment in the code should indeed be removed.
I've removed 'kernel' and 'linux-image' pseudo-packages, and added a "replace" rule from those to 'linux-2.6' (adding a note about the removal of those pseudo). Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi _______________________________________________ Reportbug-maint mailing list Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
