On Tue, 05 Jan 2010, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Personally, I'm quite dubious it would be helpful to add another step > to a tool that aims at reporting bugs :)
It might be a non-interactive step... it could be supplementary information on the last screen displayed that confirms that the bug has been sent. BTW, the URL with the stats is now on another URL: http://packages.qa.debian.org/data/pts-subscription-count.txt > Also, the heuristic of "<4 needs new contributors, >=4 the package is > well covered" is a bit weak: for example, reportbug has 4 > subscriptions, but...well, I don't receive that much help ;) It's an heuristic, it's not supposed to be fail-proof. You can even keep the messages for all package, I don't know many people who would be annoyed because supplementary people are watching/dealing with bugs. > Did your mind change during this time, or do you still believe this is > an interesting feature? I still think it's an interesting feature if done properly. :-) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog _______________________________________________ Reportbug-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
